LUKE’SPOWER RANKINGSNFL CONSENSUS · SKOL EDITION
THE WEEKLY READ 2026 SEASON

Luke’s Power Rankings.

6 perspectives. One clear picture.
The whole league, beyond the noise.

RANKING EDITION
WEEK 06
Multiple publication dates · see sources Verified publisher editions
YOUR TEAM / MINNESOTA VIKINGS SKOL

The purple perspective.

Minnesota is in every publisher’s top 10. The real debate is how much higher an improving offense can take this team.

Read the Vikings report Daily Vikings news →
#6
CONSENSUSWEEK 6
5.83 average rank#3–9 panel range
CONSENSUS NO. 1
SF49ersPANEL LEADER

The strongest average across the panel.

THE PANEL
6independent sources

Equal weight. A broader view.

ROOM FOR DEBATE
Browns#12–23

11 places between their best and lowest rank.

01 / THE BIG PICTURE

The full-league consensus32

Higher rankLower rank
RKTEAMCONSENSUS / AVERAGE RANK
StrongerLower
AVGESPNNFLCBSPFTSNUSAΔ WK
01
1.17111121—
02
1.83222212—
03
4.17554335—
04
4.67437563—
05
5.00365457—
06
5.83673649—
07
7.677468813—
08
7.671088794—
09
8.6791011976—
10
9.838121010118—
11
12.001299121218—
12
12.67131315151010—
13
13.33111112211312—
14
14.83141614111519—
15
16.33202213121417—
16
16.83171918161615—
17
17.00181420182111—
18
18.17191716171822—
19
18.50232119122016—
20
18.83151817201924—
21
19.50221522222214—
22
21.00162621191727—
23
23.33252025262321—
24
24.00242424232425—
25
24.17212523242626—
26
25.33262726252820—
27
26.00272329272723—
28
27.50282828282528—
29
29.00293127292929—
30
30.17303030303130—
31
31.00322932323031—
32
31.50313231313232—
Bars show average rank on a No. 1–32 scale; thin lines show publisher range. Tap a team for its briefing. Conference filters keep the overall league positions.
02 / BEHIND THE NUMBERS

What the panel is saying

THE COMMENTARY, CONDENSED

One paragraph per team, bringing the publishers’ perspectives together.

SF
NO. 01 CONSENSUS

San Francisco 49ers

1.17AVG RANK

San Francisco’s resilience and defense underpin its leading average. Sporting News prefers Kansas City, while the other five publishers put the 49ers first.

Panel range: #1–2
KC
NO. 02 CONSENSUS

Kansas City Chiefs

1.83AVG RANK

An improved running game strengthens Kansas City’s contender profile. Receiving injuries and limited sack production remain watch points; Sporting News gives the Chiefs its top spot.

Panel range: #1–2
JAX
NO. 03 CONSENSUS

Jacksonville Jaguars

4.17AVG RANK

Strong run defense and an effective passing connection support Jacksonville’s standing. An untidy London victory leaves questions about execution despite the favorable result.

Panel range: #3–5
SEA
NO. 04 CONSENSUS

Seattle Seahawks

4.67AVG RANK

Seattle retains considerable respect after a close loss. Turnovers, quarterback mistakes and an inconsistent running game temper optimism about the defending champion’s ceiling.

Panel range: #3–7
BUF
NO. 05 CONSENSUS

Buffalo Bills

5.00AVG RANK

Josh Allen’s late-game play reinforced confidence in Buffalo. Commentary still flags defensive lapses and ball security, with publishers varying in how heavily they weigh the comeback.

Panel range: #3–7
MIN
NO. 06 CONSENSUS

Minnesota VikingsYOUR TEAM

5.83AVG RANK

Minnesota’s defense and takeaways drive its credibility. Improving quarterback play adds upside, while the panel remains divided about the quality of its early opposition.

Go deeper: the Vikings report
Panel range: #3–9
BAL
NO. 07 CONSENSUS

Baltimore Ravens

7.67AVG RANK

Baltimore’s reserve-quarterback victory strengthens confidence in its resilience. Injuries and third-down defense remain concerns, with USA Today offering a notably lower placement than its peers.

Panel range: #4–13
DEN
NO. 08 CONSENSUS

Denver Broncos

7.67AVG RANK

Denver’s defense gives publishers reason for optimism. Offensive production and quarterback execution remain the reservations, even after the change in play-calling produced a win.

Panel range: #4–10
NE
NO. 09 CONSENSUS

New England Patriots

8.67AVG RANK

New England’s offensive resurgence has restored confidence in Drake Maye. The positive trend is balanced against questions about secondary depth and availability.

Panel range: #6–11
LAR
NO. 10 CONSENSUS

Los Angeles Rams

9.83AVG RANK

Los Angeles continues to show offensive potential. Run defense and special-teams mistakes undermine that promise, making the timing of defensive reinforcements increasingly important.

Panel range: #8–12
CIN
NO. 11 CONSENSUS

Cincinnati Bengals

12.00AVG RANK

Cincinnati’s established passing stars remain its foundation. Coverage notes defensive progress alongside uneven rushing production and a finish against Miami that became unnecessarily close.

Panel range: #9–18
CHI
NO. 12 CONSENSUS

Chicago Bears

12.67AVG RANK

Chicago’s uneven showing with a reserve quarterback complicates the assessment. Its outlook hinges on Caleb Williams returning and the defense recovering from a difficult outing.

Panel range: #10–15
DET
NO. 13 CONSENSUS

Detroit Lions

13.33AVG RANK

Detroit’s productive passing game remains the central attraction. Better defensive pressure in its latest win provides encouragement, although publishers differ on how sustainable that improvement is.

Panel range: #11–21
GB
NO. 14 CONSENSUS

Green Bay Packers

14.83AVG RANK

Green Bay’s deeper, more aggressive passing attack has revived optimism. Defensive injuries and protection concerns keep the rebound from eliminating broader questions.

Panel range: #11–19
PIT
NO. 15 CONSENSUS

Pittsburgh Steelers

16.33AVG RANK

Pittsburgh’s running production and veteran quarterback play offer a route forward. Commentary still questions offensive consistency and whether its alternating performances can become steadier.

Panel range: #12–22
LV
NO. 16 CONSENSUS

Las Vegas Raiders

16.83AVG RANK

Las Vegas’ fast start carries less weight after consecutive setbacks. Passing-game limitations and a difficult upcoming schedule leave publishers questioning its staying power.

Panel range: #15–19
CAR
NO. 17 CONSENSUS

Carolina Panthers

17.00AVG RANK

Carolina’s passing attack has generated optimism entering its next stretch. Confidence in Bryce Young contrasts with concerns about an injured secondary and limited depth.

Panel range: #11–21
NYG
NO. 18 CONSENSUS

New York Giants

18.17AVG RANK

New York’s comeback salvaged a tie and preserved some optimism. Quarterback volatility, a concentrated passing attack and defensive depth keep expectations restrained.

Panel range: #16–22
CLE
NO. 19 CONSENSUS

Cleveland Browns

18.50AVG RANK

Cleveland’s defense keeps it competitive, but protection and rushing-defense issues limit confidence. The latest loss highlights how narrow its path becomes when late offense fails.

Panel range: #12–23
DAL
NO. 20 CONSENSUS

Dallas Cowboys

18.83AVG RANK

Dallas’ defense, especially against the run, dominates the criticism. Commentary treats the problems as structural enough to outweigh the team’s offensive talent and earlier promise.

Panel range: #15–24
ATL
NO. 21 CONSENSUS

Atlanta Falcons

19.50AVG RANK

Atlanta’s competitiveness remains closely tied to Michael Penix’s availability. His injury interrupted offensive momentum, while the late defensive breakdown exposed additional vulnerability.

Panel range: #14–22
PHI
NO. 22 CONSENSUS

Philadelphia Eagles

21.00AVG RANK

Philadelphia’s injuries and offensive limitations have compounded questionable late-game decisions. The repeated setbacks leave publishers increasingly doubtful about a quick recovery.

Panel range: #16–27
NYJ
NO. 23 CONSENSUS

New York Jets

23.33AVG RANK

New York finally converted defensive pressure and rushing production into a victory. The positive result offers relief, although coverage remains cautious about broader consistency.

Panel range: #20–26
IND
NO. 24 CONSENSUS

Indianapolis Colts

24.00AVG RANK

Indianapolis’ offense depends heavily on its rushing success. Weak tackling and yards allowed after catches make it difficult to compensate when the ground game stalls.

Panel range: #23–25
HOU
NO. 25 CONSENSUS

Houston Texans

24.17AVG RANK

Houston’s quarterback and edge-rush play provide encouragement despite its record. Beating Tennessee helped, but commentary still sees a significant gap between individual promise and team results.

Panel range: #21–26
NO
NO. 26 CONSENSUS

New Orleans Saints

25.33AVG RANK

New Orleans’ early optimism has faded as offensive balance and defensive depth deteriorate. Commentary increasingly questions whether the young quarterback is being asked to do too much.

Panel range: #20–28
TB
NO. 27 CONSENSUS

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

26.00AVG RANK

Tampa Bay’s rushing attack and opportunistic defense supplied a welcome rebound. The remaining question is whether improved quarterback play can make that performance repeatable.

Panel range: #23–29
WSH
NO. 28 CONSENSUS

Washington Commanders

27.50AVG RANK

Jayden Daniels’ return restored offensive energy, particularly on the ground. Late defensive failures and poor clock management prevented that improvement from becoming a needed victory.

Panel range: #25–28
ARI
NO. 29 CONSENSUS

Arizona Cardinals

29.00AVG RANK

Arizona’s defensive problems keep undermining its preferred offensive approach. The receiver trade adds future value, while current quarterback and scoring questions remain unresolved.

Panel range: #27–31
LAC
NO. 30 CONSENSUS

Los Angeles Chargers

30.17AVG RANK

Los Angeles’ injuries and repeated giveaways continue to turn close games into losses. Protection problems and avoidable mistakes dominate a largely pessimistic set of assessments.

Panel range: #30–31
MIA
NO. 31 CONSENSUS

Miami Dolphins

31.00AVG RANK

Miami’s young rushing talent offers isolated encouragement amid a difficult rebuild. Its overall limitations remain severe, though some publishers credit the team’s continued effort.

Panel range: #29–32
TEN
NO. 32 CONSENSUS

Tennessee Titans

31.50AVG RANK

Tennessee’s ineffective passing game and low-scoring offense leave little room for optimism. Commentary sees few immediate solutions, placing it alongside Miami at the bottom.

Panel range: #31–32
03 / CHECK THE RECEIPTS

The source desk

Last checked Oct 19
A fresh perspective, every week.

Use Refresh anytime. Opening this dashboard also checks for updates when its last check is over 24 hours old.